OpenAI walked out of a federal courtroom on Monday with the result it needed. Elon Musk's lawsuit, which threatened to force a $150 billion payout and remove the company's entire leadership, was dismissed by a jury on statute of limitations grounds. The legal threat has faded, and OpenAI’s path to an initial public offering (IPO) is clearer than it has been in years. But for Sam Altman, winning the courtroom battle may have been the easiest part.

em360tech image
Photo credit: Reuters

The Verdict OpenAI Needed 

According to Reuters, the jury ruled that Musk had waited too long to bring his case that OpenAI's transition from a nonprofit to a for-profit entity was unlawful. The decision removes what legal experts described as the single largest obstacle to a public offering that could value the company at up to $1 trillion.

The ruling removes the biggest legal risk to a public listing. But even with that win, OpenAI is still left with a detailed public record about how it is run, and that will be hard to ignore. What matters now is not the result of the case, but what came out during it. Days of testimony, internal documents, and questioning in court have created a public record about leadership and decision-making, which has been based on what people inside the company said and showed.

Altman leadership questioned

During cross-examination, Musk's legal team cited statements from eight separate witnesses including Musk himself, who described Altman as having misled or lied to others. Altman's response under oath: "I believe I am an honest and trustworthy businessperson."

OpenAI's legal team pushed back, arguing the opposing side had abandoned its actual claims in favour of character assassination. One internal official, Joshua Achiam, testified that in all his direct experience, Altman had been honest with him. OpenAI Chairman Bret Taylor, who joined the board after Altman's reinstatement in late 2023, testified that Altman had been forthcoming about potential conflicts of interest and had proactively shared a note detailing them before any formal policy update.

The Memos That Will Follow Altman Into Every IPO Roadshow

The most damaging material to surface during the trial came from Mira Murati, OpenAI's former Chief Technology Officer. In a 2022 internal memo titled "Feedback from Mira to Sam" and marked for Sam's eyes only, Murati wrote: "The constant panic around our projects, people, goals, etc., generates chaos and churn. We talk about focus, but in practice, our approach is do-everything and do it fast."

In a video deposition shown to jurors, Murati paused at length when asked whether, by autumn 2023, she believed Altman was honest. Her answer: "Not always." She went on to describe Altman as someone who undermined her work and deliberately set OpenAI executives against one another.

OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever testified he had been cataloguing examples of Altman's leadership shortfalls for more than a year before the 2023 board crisis. The episode in which the board ousted Altman, only to reinstate him days later, after the majority of the company threatened to leave. These are not anonymous sources. They are co-founders and senior executives giving evidence under oath. This matters, especially for institutional investors doing due diligence.

The IPO Question No Verdict Can Answer

Conflicts of interest also emerged during the trial. Evidence suggested Sam Altman held significant investments in companies that had business ties to OpenAI. He testified that he generally recused himself in situations involving conflicts and did not believe he had misled anyone. Institutional investors will now have to decide how they view that explanation ahead of any public offering. The legal risk may be gone, but the governance questions remain. For a company seeking a $1 trillion valuation on the strength of its leadership and mission, the gap between those two outcomes may prove to be its biggest challenge in 2026.